More good news for Edwards: Steelworkers to endorse

I'll get right to the news first. The largest industrial union in North America is endorsing John Edwards for president.

From the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette:


Former Sen. John Edwards will start his Labor Day in Pittsburgh to accept a presidential endorsement from the United Steelworkers.

Mr. Edwards is expected to appear with United Steelworkers president Leo Gerard at a 9 a.m. rally at the Mellon Arena, the kickoff site for the city's annual Labor Day Parade.

This is huge not only because of the steelworkers large membership (1.2 million members), but because the USW is one of the more progressive unions out there (especially in the AFL-CIO), along with the UAW, UFCW, etc. They're one of the few unions that have explicitly sought out partnerships with major environmental groups as witnessed by their joint campaign with the Sierra Club to create good paying union jobs that are also green jobs. They're also pretty adamant about furthering the larger international labor movement (even going so far as to talk about merging with the UK's second largest labor union) in order to give workers a fighting chance against large multi-national corporations (and the governments that enable them). In short they're a great union and this is a great endorsement.

Now that Edwards has two big endorsements under his belt I think it will be much easier for the other major unions to go with their hearts and their minds and also endorse Edwards.

It actually would have been a huge surprise if the USW had not endorsed Edwards in the end given some of the union's major priorities such as ensuring that (i) all Americans have health care, (ii) inferior products stop flowing into our country due to inferior trade agreements (ahem... China). Edwards's priorities are a natural fit with the union's. And when you combine that with Edwards's vocal, and enthusiastic support of the labor movement throughout all aspects of the campaign (and not just at labor events), it's pretty clear that he should be the top choice.

Let's hope the other labor endorsements for Edwards start coming fast and furious now.



Display:


Re: More good news for Edwards: Steelworkers to en (2.00 / 11)

They keep trying to kick the man down, but he just will not stop! Go Johnny Reid! Go!


by adamterando on Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 09:29:17 PM EST

Re: More good news for Edwards: Steelworkers to en (2.00 / 4)

And Steelworkers is over a million members.
Isn't Carpenters and Joiners about 300K?

Hillary/Obama08
by annefrank on Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 09:51:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More good news for Edwards: Steelworkers to en (2.00 / 3)

I read that Carpenters was about 500k (nothing to sneeze at) and that USW after all its mergers is not at 1.2 million.


by adamterando on Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 09:53:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Nice (none / 0)

The Steel workers are a great get


by MassEyesandEars on Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 06:48:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More good news for Edwards: Steelworkers to en (2.00 / 6)

I agree that more unions may be less reticent to endorse Edwards, especially since his poll numbers are looking better too.


by benny06 on Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 09:41:28 PM EST

Re: More good news for Edwards: Steelworkers to en (2.00 / 3)

Yeah the carpenters union is great, but the USW is really one of the big 'uns. The other unions will definitely pay attention to this one.


by adamterando on Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 09:45:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More good news for Edwards (2.00 / 4)

Look for more haircut stories.  The corporate media REALLY hates unions and candidates advocating for them and the middle class.

WooHoo!!  John Edwards will be a great President!


Hillary/Obama08
by annefrank on Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 09:49:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Edwards/Unions (2.00 / 8)

Fantastic news,I'm a union bricklayer from Chicago and what I heard at my union meeting tuesday is that Edwards will get our endorsement.I believe all the building trades unions will follow and back Edwards.


by puresmoke on Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 10:13:45 PM EST

Re: Edwards/Unions (2.00 / 3)

Excellent! Thanks for the work you do!


by adamterando on Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 10:18:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More good news for Edwards (2.00 / 2)

Great news for John Edwards.

It's always good when hard work pays off.

Makes me feel sorry for John Edwards when he does so much for unions like IAM, which he worked on several projects with, and he gets nothing in return for it.

Until last night the Edwards folks were under the impression that they were going to receive IAM's endorsement, and then today they find out that they didn't.  That's one reason why I was so angry about it.  I wonder if the fake "SUVs" scandal that the media spun all out of context was enough to scare off IAM.

Either way, if true, this news from the Steelworkers makes me feel a lot better.


by OE on Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 10:14:04 PM EST

Re: More good news for Edwards (2.00 / 1)

Man if that's the case then the IAM sure is a jittery bunch. A one day non-story that 95% of the country has not heard about would be enough to take away the endorsement? Yikes, I hope not.


by adamterando on Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 10:20:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More good news for Edwards (1.00 / 3)

what work has he done for the unions except those empty slogans?

Biden nailed him. You don't start to walk the picket line only because you decide to run for president...

He is such a faked character, and will be crushed by any GOP candidate.


Hillary: We will finally have a president who doesn't mind pulling over and asking for directions. Am I right, ladies?
by areyouready on Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 10:22:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More good news for Edwards (2.00 / 3)

How about working to organize workers? Seems to me that's pretty important for the health of a labor organization.

It's much better anyway than staring blankly off into space at a Wal-mart board meeting when they're discussing their latest union busting strategy.


by adamterando on Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 10:25:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More good news for Edwards (1.00 / 4)

He organized worker? This is the first time I've heard this story. Sorry, I just believe this guy is still touting his white southern electability crap. He lost his home state to G.W. by an embarrasing margin.


Hillary: We will finally have a president who doesn't mind pulling over and asking for directions. Am I right, ladies?
by areyouready on Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 10:33:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More good news for Edwards (2.00 / 1)

Skippy, Your a total rightwing jag off, get the hell outta here.


by puresmoke on Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 11:00:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

STFU (2.00 / 3)

That is the stupidest crap I have heard.

You think that NC was going to go blue with John Kerry at the top of the ticket?

How dilusional are you?

They didn't even make Edwards visible, as Kerry was angling for another try.

What a desperte pathetic thing to say from a sad pathetic desperate hack.

And by the way, NC was THE ONLY southern state that bush didn't increase his 04' margine you know-nothing hack.

You are with Mrs. NAFTA and you are trying to tell us that Edwards hasn't done enough for workers.

Holy shit, that's a good one.

Your candidate is as shrill as it gets, the wingnuts have the dirt on her and they will use it (ignoring that shows how fucked up your priorities are...it's all about hillary with you pathetic Clintonistas), and with that the small chance she had to win the general will go the way of the DLC.  In other words, it will die off.

In the words of a third grade version of myself, you my friend are a "super size penis wrinkle".

And in the words of P.Diddy "Take that, take that, take that...

hack


The bold progressive leader is the most electable candidate. Reclaim the Democratic Party! Support John Edwards.
by Michael 4 Edwards on Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 11:09:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: STFU (none / 0)

Well said brother!


by puresmoke on Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 11:24:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

No research; no knowledge; (none / 0)

just atttacks against all others for Hillary Clinton.  A troll, you are.

You don't care about facts.  

Silly.  Too bad Clinton has such disingenious supporters.


by TomP on Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 11:11:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I disagree heartily ... (2.00 / 4)

... disingenuous and ingenuous are close cousins, and I don't reckon RUReddy is ingenuous enough to be counted as disingenuous.

"Transparent hypocrisy", perhaps. "I hadn't heard that John Edwards had walked on picket lines and has been one of organized labor's staunchest friends when it comes to lending a hand" is kind of like, "I hadn't heard that the occupation of Iraq was running into trouble" ... simply a failure to be entirely aware of what is going on in the outside world.

"I hadn't heard that the firm of one of Senator Clinton's top campaign advisors makes money from training firms to bust unions" would be more disingenuous, because a lot of people may still be unaware of that.


*John Edwards* ... and the JE08 Supporters Blog
by BruceMcF on Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 12:46:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More good news for Edwards (2.00 / 1)

I find great comfort in your obvious desperation.  Thanks!


"If [John Edwards] seems too good to be true, well, so be it; instead, you can pick a candidate who's bad enough to be plausible." - Daily Kos user Drew
by Junior Bug on Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 10:13:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Look ma! A troll! n/t (2.00 / 1)


by okamichan13 on Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 10:30:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More good news for Edwards (2.00 / 1)

Can't attack the information so attack the character.  Sounds like a right-wing tactic to me.

He won the endorsement - deal with it.


Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. -- Martin Luther King, Jr.
by passionateprogressive on Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 11:29:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More good news for Edwards (2.00 / 3)

First of all, he helped many of them GET WHAT THEY WERE ON STRIKE FOR by virtue of who he was.  He added some star power to many of their campaigns, like the Janitors in Florida, and the Culinary workers in NV, that helped push their efforts over the top, and they got what they were bargaining for.

He also worked with these unions to get minimum wage increases on the ballots, and all of them passed, but I've got to go to work now...


by OE on Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 06:58:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More good news for Edwards (none / 0)

Simple question, kid. If Edwards wins the nom, are you supporting him?


by desmoulins on Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 12:37:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More good news for Edwards (2.00 / 1)

That's not what the polls say. In every match-up I've ever seen, Edwards polls the best out of all Democrats versus all Republican potential candidates.

Hillary polls worse than an average Democrat in general polling right now.


by Pope Jeremy on Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 05:18:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More good news for Edwards (none / 0)

the way you get endorsement is by pandering and Edwards had 4 years to do so freely while the others had a day job.

I would agree with Biden that Edwards only started caring once he decided to run for president but i still give him credit for really going hard after those endorsement..He's been at it for years.


by JaeHood on Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 10:42:57 PM EST

LOL!! Sour grapes. (2.00 / 3)

"pandering?"  Not what you said when Barack Obama was endorsed by people.  

Obama is now third and dropping with a thud in South Carolina.  How is he going to win the entire south if he cannot even win the Dems in South Carolina?  Maybe Governor Wilder got it wrong?


by TomP on Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 11:14:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: LOL!! Sour grapes. (none / 0)

How is Edwards going to win the nomination with no kind of support from blacks or Hispanics.

If you really think Edwards is ahead of Obama in S.C , then you are clearly dreaming.

I have family members in SC and they've told me Edwards black support is just not there..Your candidate biggest prolem is that the lack electorate is way too large to expect him to win with very litle black support.

Edwards cant win the south while having the support of only white males...it will not happen in those primaries states.


by JaeHood on Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 11:47:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

So you base (2.00 / 2)

Obama's election on a racial appeal?  That is sad.  

As for South Carolina, the latest poll shows Obama in third.

I am no big follower of polls, but I am sure you loved it last month when he was first.

You assume that blacks will vote for Obama and women for Clinton.  I think that is an immarture understanding of politics.

As Obama continues his fade, I expect many soft ssupporters to leave him.  


by TomP on Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 08:34:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More good news for Edwards (2.00 / 6)

at least he's pandering to the right people. you seem to be confused. politics is about trying to build relationships with peo. if i had my choice i prefer our candidates pander to the unions rather than Big Pharma


by bruh21 on Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 12:07:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More good news for Edwards (2.00 / 2)

"while the others had a day job."

True enough.  Edwards resigned so that he could do a credible job campaigning for the presidency.

Obama promised he would serve a full term before he would run.  Instead after just 1/3 of his term he is running.  
It is his choice to run and to try to do his job.  Maybe it is just too hard.  


I am an Edwards Democrat. Visit EENR blog for Progressives
by pioneer111 on Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 01:22:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More good news for Edwards (2.00 / 2)

That's a lie.

John Edwards resigned because he told the NC CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY that he wouldn't make their jobs harder by running for two offices.  He resigned around the beginning of 2004, for that reason, so the NC could field a Senate candidate.

Of course they ran Erskine Bowles again, but Bowles would have done better with Edwards at the top of the ticket, because they would have actually spent some money in NC.

The Kerry campaign DIDN'T EVEN RUN ONE TELEVISION AD in NC, so for people to say they lost the state because of John Edwards is idiotic.

John Edwards made a principled decision.  He kept his word and allowed NC Democrats to field a Senate canddiate.


by OE on Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 06:55:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More good news for Edwards (none / 0)

Edwards didn't resign.  

he just didn't seek reelection.


by DrFrankLives on Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 05:32:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More good news for Edwards (none / 0)

You know what I meant.


by OE on Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 06:54:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More good news for Edwards (none / 0)

I supposed he should have paid them like Obama did.


Join us at Show Me Progress!
by clarkent on Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 09:26:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More good news for Edwards (2.00 / 1)

Obama and his team have also been working their plan ever since he got elected to the senate. In an article about Obama and his team and how they've been shaping his public image they talked about how right from the very begining they had a 08/10/12 plan for him (President, Governor, Re-election to the senate) so he's in I think a worse position than Edwards if all that bothers you as before he was even sworn in to begin serving his first senate term he was working to run for President just a 1/3 of the way into his term or for Governor 2/3 of the way through his term.

Edwards on the other hand waited to run until after having served most of his term and I believe had he not have decided to run for president then would have run for re-election for his senate seat (and had a solid win as polls predicted all the way through the race) rather than looked to run for Governor or anything else, was the VP candidate in 2004 so it's hardly surprising that he's running again in 2008, and he had several 'day jobs' since 2004 they were just outside the rarifed confines of the US Senate chamber.

Just about all serious candidates that run for President do so after years of planning and cultivating the necessary support and national image. That's just how it is. Obama is in the same boat with everyone else on this.


by Quinton on Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 09:27:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]

MESSAGE TO THE DLC (2.00 / 2)

I'm going to have to steal a line from Dave Chapelle's Rick James for this message to Mark Penn, Howard Wolfson, and the DLC...

PROGRESSIVE POPULISM BITCHES!!!


The bold progressive leader is the most electable candidate. Reclaim the Democratic Party! Support John Edwards.
by Michael 4 Edwards on Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 11:03:55 PM EST

Re: MESSAGE TO THE DLC (2.00 / 1)

Right on!


by puresmoke on Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 11:08:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I'll steal from his 'Lil John (none / 0)

"WHHAAT?"


by dpANDREWS on Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 11:35:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

hey, he's gonna be late (2.00 / 5)

for the Labor Day parade in Des Moines on Monday! Oh well, what can you do?

I'm going to march with the Edwards group in that parade--he'll fly in sometime in the late morning (central time) to address a gathering at the state fairgrounds. Looking forward to it!


John McCain: 100 years in Iraq "would be fine with me."
by desmoinesdem on Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 11:04:31 PM EST

Watch the rank and file union vote (none / 0)

I have a feeling I know where its going.

The men and women are pretty savvy and they follow actual voting records closer than probably any other group of Americans.


by dpANDREWS on Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 11:34:10 PM EST

Re: Watch the rank and file union vote (2.00 / 1)

Somewhat true,38% of union members voted for the shrub, There is still a bunch of work to be done. Race,rifles and religion.The wedge issues are a major problem with union people. If they knew the true facts about repubs on labor issues,that percentage would drop big time.The msm is the problem!


by puresmoke on Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 11:54:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More good news for Edwards: Steelworkers to en (2.00 / 4)

Congratulations for Edwards. That's a good endorsement. Though I support another candidate in the primary, I think Edwards is introducing issues of value for workers, and I will proudly support him if he wins the nomination.

That's 2 to 2 on international union endorsements for Clinton and Edwards, and I expect they might continue both gathering a lot.


by markjay on Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 12:00:47 AM EST

This is a good occasion to remember ... (2.00 / 4)

... that at one time men swung hammers to lay down steel to tie this country together.

John Henry (Bruce Springsteen), YouTube


*John Edwards* ... and the JE08 Supporters Blog
by BruceMcF on Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 12:50:08 AM EST

Re: This is a good occasion to remember ... (none / 0)

Man, a 2? Waddya got against railroads and Energy Independence?

Or do you prefer the Boss to be electric?


*John Edwards* ... and the JE08 Supporters Blog
by BruceMcF on Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 01:49:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Never mind ... they keep changing the ... (none / 0)

... numbers on this fracking site.


*John Edwards* ... and the JE08 Supporters Blog
by BruceMcF on Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 01:50:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Edwards: Steelworkers to endorse (2.00 / 3)

CARPENTERS!!!
STEEL WORKERS!!!

Go Johnny Go!!!

John Foster
GCC/IBT LOCAL 4C


by jfoster on Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 07:56:46 AM EST

Re: More good news for Edwards (2.00 / 2)

Solidarity kicks ass.


Help build a stronger and more progressive Democratic Party from the grassroots on up
by Peter from WI on Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 09:48:36 AM EST

Edwards will have a big lead in union endorsements (none / 0)

When it is all said and done Edwards will get the endorsements, and with it the phone banks and the people knocking on doors.  But the biggest union states are also some of the biggest Clinton states and an endorsement doesn't mean the rank and file will vote for you.

I think the union endorsements will boost Edwards and I stand by my prediction that he will overtake Obama as the solid number 2 something this fall.

However, I don' think the unions will carry him to victory.  Dean scored early and big with the unions in 2003 and it did him no good.

Dean's endorsements:

http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicsele ctions/nation/2003-11-12-labor-dean_x.ht m

1.4 million-member American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, and the 1.6-million-member Service Employees International Union in this article.

http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/10/2 3/dean.union.ap/index.html

The 140,000 member International Union of Painters and Allied Trades in this article.

http://fe38.news.sp1.yahoo.com/s/ap/2007 0830/ap_on_el_pr/labor_endorsements

Good summary.  Gephardt lead during the 04 cycle with 6 major union endorsements.


by dpANDREWS on Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 12:30:55 PM EST

Re: Edwards will have a big lead in union endorsem (none / 0)

They both lost Iowa though.


by adamterando on Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 11:36:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Edwards will have a big lead in union endorsem (none / 0)

John Edwards isn't Howard Dean.

Edwards has several qualities that make him a stronger candidate than Dean, mainly the fact that he can say everything that Dean said and still come across as a "nice guy," and a "moderate," instead of a fire-breathing liberal, meaning he doesn't lose his general election appeal by taking more definitive positions.


by OE on Sun Sep 02, 2007 at 12:21:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Dean never had the depth in Iowa (none / 0)

that Edwards obvioiusly has throughout the state.


by okamichan13 on Sat Sep 01, 2007 at 11:20:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More good news for Edwards: Steelworkers to en (none / 0)

Good for him.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Ernst on Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 02:34:00 PM EST

Change to Win (2.00 / 2)

It will be interesting to see if other Change to Win unions (SEIU, Teamsters, Laborors, UFCW, UNITE HERE, etc.) follow the carpenters.  It's great to see the USW doing the right thing and endorsing a great pro-labor candidate.

Go Johnny Go!


by IowaProgressive on Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 03:57:37 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.